Forum Questions - Hague Convention
Firstly, its full name is the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980. It is a treaty binding over 60 different countries in the world designed to deal with abduction of children between them quickly – and return them to their home country as soon as possible, save for in exceptional situations.
Yes, providing the other country involved is also bound by it.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes, because these countries are bound by the Hague Convention, which also covers abductions between these countries and Israel in the other direction.
No. India is not bound by the convention.
Most of them, but not if the abductions involve Bolivia or Paraguay.
Possibly, as many of these states are bound by the Convention, but not if the child is abducted to Russia and or the Ukraine, which are not bound by it.
No. None of the Arab states are signatories to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The concept of parental authority and rights under Islamic law is very different from the guiding principles behind the Convention.
No.
In this case the Convention will not apply, and the 'left-behind' parent will have to bring an action for the child's return in the country to which he/she has been abducted.
It should not, as the case will be heard by a civil court, the appropriate family court, and the principle governing the plea are those of the Hague Convention, which are not related to religion at all.